Myco.Run: Alternative Materials and Processes in Footwear Production

A regenerative approach to running shoe design using mycelium-based composites and additive manufacturing.

Can a running shoe grow itself?

institution
Folkwang University
field of study
Sustainable Footwear Design
Timeframe
Winter 2021
submission
Spring 2022

Research & Problem Definition

A standard running shoe relies on over 12 different materials — EVA foam, TPU overlays, synthetic mesh, rubber outsoles, and industrial adhesives. This complex material mix creates significant challenges: fossil fuel dependency, manufacturing waste, and near-impossible recycling at end-of-life.

Shoe parts explained

Conventional Running Shoe

  • Rubber 110 g
  • Synthetic fabric 56 g
  • Synthetic felt 41 g
  • Hard plastic 12 g
  • Performance textile 8 g
  • Mesh 5.6 g
  • Foam material 5 g
  • Additional foam 4.4 g

Total: 242 g

Myco.Run

  • Mycelium 80 g
  • Bamboo 30 g
  • Hemp felt 5 g

Total: 115 g

The footwear industry has begun exploring sustainability through recycled polyester and bio-based foams, but these efforts rarely question the fundamental production process itself. Myco.Run addresses this gap by proposing a regenerative, mono-material system rooted in biological growth rather than industrial assembly.

Contextualized within a speculative 2035 scenario, post-pandemic, post-industrial, with localized supply chains and circular economies, Myco.Run envisions footwear not as a finished product shipped globally, but as a living material grown locally by its user.

"Myco.Run challenges the conventional linear lifecycle by making the user part of the regenerative process."

Material comparison: conventional multi-material construction vs. mycelium-based mono-material system

Material Exploration

Understanding Mycelium

Mycelium, the root structure of fungi, forms dense, fibrous networks capable of replacing leather, foam, and composite materials. Companies like Ecovative and MycoWorks have demonstrated mycelium's viability in packaging and fashion, but its application in high-performance footwear remains largely unexplored.

I conducted material experiments to understand mycelium's growth behavior, structural properties, and integration potential with additive manufacturing. Key challenges included contamination control, achieving consistent density, and directional growth management.

Key Insight: By strategically inoculating specific zones within a parametric lattice mold, mycelium density can be controlled, creating softer cushioning in the heel and firmer support in the midfoot.

Microscopic view of mycelium fiber structure

First "air" mycelium growing tests

Mycelium grew through plastic container and is fixed

Shore-density measurements of "air"-grown mycelium in comparison to regular midsole foam

Through iterative testing, I developed a growth protocol where:

  • Mycelium substrate fills an additively manufactured lattice mold
  • Grid spacing determines material density (wide = dense cushioning, narrow = flexible zones)
  • Growth occurs over 7–10 days at controlled temperature and humidity
  • The material naturally bonds to textile and bamboo components without adhesives

Concept Development

From Research to Form

Early design iterations explored three conceptual directions:

Caged — An exoskeleton filled with mycelium substrate
Bonded — Laced components grown together through mycelium integration
Grown — A holistic approach where upper and sole develop as one organism

The final concept Myco.Run synthesizes these explorations into a user-grown system.

Caged moodboard and structural sketch

Caged rendering

Caged concept sketches and CAD design

First prototype of "Caged" concept

First prototype detail of "Caged" concept

First prototype of "Caged" concept

First prototype of "Caged" concept

Bonded: Moodboard and structural sketch

Bonded first concept sketches

Bonded first renderings

Bonded first renderings

Grown moodboard and structural sketch

Grown first sketches and construction concept

The final concept — Myco.Run — synthesizes these explorations into a user-grown system.

Mycorun: First process prototype before inoculation

Mycorun: First process prototype in growing phase

Automated Personalization

The production process begins not in a factory, but with the user:

01
Gait Analysis
Pressure mapping identifies individual strike patterns, pronation, and support needs
02
Parametric Structure
Data informs lattice geometry, balancing cushioning, stability, and weight
03
Additive Mold Production
A 3D-printed growth form ships to the user
04
Mycelium Inoculation
The user fills the mold with substrate and initiates growth
05
Assembly
After 10 days, the grown sole integrates with the upper and bamboo rocker

Gait analysis of a heel striking runner

The process in a nut-shell

"Each shoe grows from its own data, no two pairs are identical."

Final Design

User Journey

01
Gait Scan
The user visits a local scan station or uses a mobile app to capture running biomechanics.
02
Grow-Kit Delivery
A personalized kit arrives containing: additively manufactured growth mold (bamboo-reinforced lattice), mycelium substrate, knit upper with hemp felt heel counter, nutrient solution for growth activation
03
Home Cultivation
The user fills the mold, seals it, and stores it in a dark, temperate space. Over 7–10 days, mycelium colonizes the lattice structure, bonding with the textile upper.
04
Activation & Use
Once growth completes, the mold is removed. The mycelium is heat-treated to halt growth, creating a durable, cushioned sole. Targeted post-inoculation allows users to reinforce high-wear zones over time.
05
End of Life
When performance degrades, the shoe is composted or returned as substrate for future production.
−52%
material weight
0
adhesives
100%
compostable
"From consumer to co-creator. Myco.Run redefines how we connect with our products."

Growing-Kit for Myco.Run

Growing-Kit for Myco.Run assambled

Homegrown Myco.Run shoe

Homegrown Myco.Run shoe

Reflection and Learnings

Design Learnings

Myco.Run began as a material substitution challenge, replacing EVA with mycelium. But it evolved into a systemic reimagining of footwear production. The most significant insights emerged not from the material itself, but from the process it enabled:

Regenerative Design
Growth-based manufacturing eliminates waste streams inherent to cutting and assembly
Localized Production
Distributed cultivation reduces logistics and enables regional customization
User Participation
Involving the wearer in creation fosters deeper product attachment and care
Lifecycle Integration
Designing for composting from the outset challenges planned obsolescence

Relevance to Performance Footwear

While speculative, Myco.Run addresses real challenges facing brands like adidas: material innovation, supply chain localization, and circular economy mandates. The project demonstrates how biological materials and parametric manufacturing can coexist with performance requirements not as compromises, but as enhancements.

Future development could explore:

  • Mycelium composite blends for enhanced durability
  • Digital platforms linking gait analysis to automated mold generation
  • Partnerships with urban farming networks for substrate production
  • Integration with existing knit upper technologies (Primeknit, Flyknit)
"Myco.Run transforms design from industrial output to living process — a philosophy ready for the future of performance footwear."